Government Control Essay
635 Words3 Pages
Any government with total control is worth being feared and having a group of individuals who go against their government. With complete control, a government is capable of committing acts against their citizens, which can be perceived as “something good” from the government’s point of view. In 1984 by George Orwell, and “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut, the main characters, Winston and Harrison, feel oppressed by the government's acts and events, try to overthrow their government, and go through a realization of hopelessness and defeat. With complete control, a government is capable of committing acts against their citizens, which can be perceived as “something good” from the government’s point of view. Winston Smith feels…show more content…
The mental and physical handicaps he wore gave him headaches and left him half blind. This is why Harrison began to go against his government. Both Winston and Harrison decided to go rebel against their governments and against the government’s thoughts and ways. As a result, Winston’s and Harrison’s actions led to greater acts of rebellion. Winston began affair with Julia and he began to study the work of the Brotherhood leader, Emmanuel Goldstein (Orwell, 151). Winston believed that he would have to study this to become a member of the infamous Brotherhood. The Brotherhood is the secret, anti-government organization that Winston felt he needed to be a part of. He believed that this would be the ultimate action against The Party. Harrison didn’t need a group or secret organization to rebel against the government. His size gave him an advantage to escape prison (Vonnegut, 24). Harrison escaped from prison to show everyone he isn’t afraid of his government. He went on television to show everyone that he is a greater ruler than any man who ever lived. Winston and Harrison didn’t really recognize how deep they were involved against their government. Consequently, both Winston’s and Harrison’s actions had severe penalties. Winston and Julia were caught by the Thought Police with Goldstein’s work and they were taken to the Ministry of Love to be severely tortured for their actions (Orwell, 185).
Even though they knew the
The Power and Authority of the Government Essay examples
845 Words4 Pages
The Power and Authority of the Government
Power can be seen as the capacity of a government to get its citizens to comply with it. Power is quite broadly used and can even be seen as obedience as this shows a deliberate self restraint of citizens that might otherwise resist the government. It has a direct connection with authority as authority carries the implication that the institution that has power is supported in its decisions by a substantial amount of people and therefore should be obeyed whether or not the individual agrees with it. A government can have power, but it must be somewhat representative to have authority.
The distinction between power and authority can be seen in our system…show more content…
There are differences in the types of authority however. In a democratic country, authority is found within the constitution that gives legality to the law. However, in the Islamic republic, authority has a far greater bearing on religion and expresses the divine will of the Koran. So in a sense, power can be exercised in the short term and not necessarily agreed with, but in the long term, authority must be gained by adhering with the current cultures and political environment at the time.
There is an opinion that a government does not require authority and can exercise power alone. The faculty of having power can give an institution the right or the authority to use it. In a dictatorship it is arguable that the leader can have power without authority, as even though the people may disagree they are too fearful of what will happen if they do not obey the government at the time. Even though the stable political systems of the American and English institutions are legitimatised by authority, the emergency powers of the president in the American system and his ability to veto, which are not representative powers, show that there are still cases where power proves its ability without authority. This is similar to the non-consultation to the cabinet in British politics, the prime minister has the power to do this as leader of